Legal Opinion
Conference Group, LLC v. Federal Communications Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided July 2, 2013No. 12-1124PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge ROGERS.
ROGERS, Circuit Judge:
In 2008 the Federal Communications Commission decided that the audio bridging services provided by InterCall, Inc. are properly classified as “telecommunications” under the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and thereby obligate it and “similarly situated” providers to contribute directly to the Universal Service Fund (“USF”), 47 U.S.C. § 254(d). The Conference Group, joined by intervenor Cisco WebEx, contends that the Commission converted an unlawful decision by the administrator of the USF as to InterCall, Inc.’s…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Pom Wonderful, LLC v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Neustar, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- National Biodiesel Board v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Washington v. Federal Election CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- ITServe Alliance, Inc. v. DHSCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2023
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.