Legal Opinion
Neustar, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 26, 2017No. 15-1080 Consolidated with 16-1293PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SENTELLE, Senior Circuit Judge:
Neustár, Inc. petitions for review of orders of the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC” or the “Commission”) naming another company to replace Neustar as the Local Number Portability Administrator (“LNPA” or “LNP Administrator”). Petitioner argues that the Commission erred in not properly determining issues relating to the new Administrator’s corporate affiliations. Finding no error in the Commission’s decision, for the reasons set forth below, we deny the petitions.
I. Backgkoünd
The Telecommunications Act of 1996 (“Act”) requires telecommunications…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Heckler v. RingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Rivers v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Breda v. Cellco PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
- Safari Club International v. Ryan ZinkeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Juan Amaya v. Jeffrey RosenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
- SoundExchange, Inc. v. Copyright Royalty Bd.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- PSSI Global Services, L.L.C. v. FCCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.