Legal Opinion
Pom Wonderful, LLC v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 30, 2015No. 13-1060PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SRINIVASAN.
SRINIVASAN, Circuit Judge:
POM Wonderful, LLC produces, markets, and sells a number of pomegranate-based products. In a series of advertisements from 2003 to 2010, POM touted medical studies ostensibly showing that daily consumption of its products could treat, prevent, or reduce the risk of various ailments, including heart disease, prostate cancer, and erectile dysfunction. Many of those ads miseharacterized the scientific evidence concerning the health benefits of POM’s products with regard to those diseases.
In 2010, the Federal Trade…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Board of Trustees of State Univ. of NY v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Edenfield v. FaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Grace v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020
- Masters Pharmaceutical, Inc. v. Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Nicopure Labs, LLC v. FDACourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- State Of Washington v. Living Essentials, Llc, Et Ano.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- Fanning v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.