Legal Opinion
United States v. Crumpton
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided October 30, 1998No. 1:96-cr-00419PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DANIEL, District Judge.
On October 2, 1998, Defendant Crumpton, through his counsel, filed a Motion to Exclude Witnesses and Suppress Testimony. Through this motion the Defendant argues that the Court should preclude the testimony of any witness testifying against him who has been given anything of value in exchange for their testimony because such conduct violates 18 U.S.C. § 201(c)(2), Crumpton’s due process rights under the Constitution and his right to a fair trial. Two authorities noted in the Motion are United States v. Singleton, 144 F.3d 1343 (10th Cir.1998)…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Sonya Evette SingletonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. LoweryDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Jack Hutchins HaeseCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. LoweryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- United States v. AbrahamDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- United States v. Roque-AcostaDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1998
- Billy Chancey v. Paramount Pictures ProductionsDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2026
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.