Legal Opinion

United States v. Jack Hutchins Haese

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 15, 1999No. 97-10307PublishedCited by 106 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REYNALDO G. GARZA, Circuit Judge:

The appellant brings forth this appeal raising four issues: (1) whether he was denied effective assistance of counsel; (2) whether the district court erred in granting the government’s Motion In Limine; (3) whether Haese was entitled to an evidentiary hearing based on his allegations of prosecutorial misconduct; and (4) whether the district court plainly erred in admitting testimony of the government’s key witness in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 201(c)(2) because that testimony was obtained in exchange for a favorable plea agreement.

I. Factual and Procedural…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Michel v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by106 opinions

  1. United States v. Sonya Evette Singleton, National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  2. Castillo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  3. United States v. Michael WallaceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
  4. United States v. Willie James Richardson, A/K/A Riz, A/K/A RaheemCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. LaraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999

101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API