Legal Opinion

United States v. Abraham

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided November 23, 1998No. CRIMINAL NO. 98-249 (JBS)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SIMANDLE, District Judge.

According to the government, defendant Solomon Abraham is guilty of conspiring with others to sell used automobiles with the mileage odometers rolled back. Pursuant to a plea agreement, Israel Einhorn plead guilty to some of the same illegal conduct alleged in Abraham’s indictment, and the government will allege at trial that Abraham and Einhorn, among others, were co-conspirators in this crime. Einhorn’s plea agreement stated that in exchange for his cooperation, including providing substantial assistance to the government (such as testifying against Abraham),…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Lisenba v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. LoweryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
  2. Eh Yacht, LLC v. Egg Harbor, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
  3. Doe v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
  4. United States v. LoweryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API