Legal Opinion

New York Bankers, Inc. v. Duncan

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 15, 1931PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cardozo, Ch. J.

The complaint is upon three negotiable promissory notes given by the defendant to the Arflex Lamp and Fixture Manufacturing Corporation, and indorsed by the payee to the plaintiff.

The answer is, first, that the notes in suit and others renewed thereby were procured through fraudulent representations by the agent of the payee and were thereafter received by the plaintiff with knowledge of the fraud, and, second, a counterclaim for payments made to the plaintiff on account of the notes before discovery by the defendant of the wrong that he had suffered.

The notes renewed by those…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Canajoharie National Bank v. DiefendorfNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Hull v. . LittauerNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. Kley v. . HealyNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Joy v. . DiefendorfNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. Second National Bank v. WestonNew York Court of Appeals · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. RothschildNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  2. Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co. v. SapowitchNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
  3. In re the Estate of NowakowskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. First Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. HeilmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  5. Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A. v. Finger Lakes Motors, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API