Legal Opinion

Farnese v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 16, 1985No. 1990 Philadelphia, 1982PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, Judge:

The plaintiffs, Mr. and Mrs. Farnese, brought suit against the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (hereinafter “SEPTA”) for injuries allegedly suffered while he was a passenger on a SEPTA bus. SEPTA joined the City of Philadelphia (hereinafter “City”) as an additional defendant, averring that the City failed to keep its streets in a state of repair, which precipitated Mr. Farnese’s injuries. At the close of evidence the court directed a verdict in favor of the City. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs and against SEPTA. SEPTA filed post-trial…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. FLICKINGER ESTATE v. RitskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Flagiello v. CrillySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Cuthbert v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. Moyer v. Ford Motor Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. Idlette v. TraceySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Krauss, C. v. Trane US Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Reilly v. Tiergarten Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Keffer v. Bob Nolan's Auto Service, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Markovich v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Cipriani v. Sun Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API