Farnese v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CERCONE, Judge:
The plaintiffs, Mr. and Mrs. Farnese, brought suit against the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (hereinafter “SEPTA”) for injuries allegedly suffered while he was a passenger on a SEPTA bus. SEPTA joined the City of Philadelphia (hereinafter “City”) as an additional defendant, averring that the City failed to keep its streets in a state of repair, which precipitated Mr. Farnese’s injuries. At the close of evidence the court directed a verdict in favor of the City. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs and against SEPTA. SEPTA filed post-trial…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- FLICKINGER ESTATE v. RitskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Flagiello v. CrillySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Cuthbert v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Moyer v. Ford Motor Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Idlette v. TraceySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Krauss, C. v. Trane US Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Reilly v. Tiergarten Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Keffer v. Bob Nolan's Auto Service, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Markovich v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- Cipriani v. Sun Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.