Legal Opinion

Davis v. Walbrook Ins. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 31, 1995No. 94-15703Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

69 F.3d 543

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Ralph D. DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

WALBROOK INS. CO.; Dart Kraft Insurance Company; El Paso

Insurance Company; Louisville Insurance Company; Ludgate

Insurance Company Limited; Mutual Reinsurance Company,

Limited; Compagnie Europeenne D'Assurances Industrielles

S.A.; Assicurazioni Generali Spa, London Branch; H.S.

Weavers…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. Western National Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Murphy v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Barrera v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Betts v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Ramona Manor Convalescent Hospital v. Care EnterprisesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API