Legal Opinion

The Estate of Benjamin Holland v. Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 2012No. 38157-2010PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EISMANN, Justice.

This is an appeal from the denial of attorney fees under Idaho Code section 41-1839 on the ground that the insured’s proof of loss was insufficient under the statute because it did not provide the insurer with the legal theory upon which coverage was later determined to exist. We vacate the judgment because a proof of loss need not include an analysis of the proper theory of coverage under the insurance policy.

I

Factual Background.

On October 25, 2009, Benjamin Holland was killed in a single vehicle accident caused by the negligence of the driver of the car in which Mr. Holland…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Camp v. East Fork Ditch Co., Ltd.Idaho Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Brinkman v. Aid Insurance Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Weinstein v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Hansen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Greenough v. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Mosell Equities, LLC v. Berryhill & Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Morgan v. New Sweden Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
  3. John Doe No. 1 v. Knights of ColumbusDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
  4. Seward v. Musick Auction, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Kosmann v. DiniusIdaho Supreme Court · 2019

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API