Legal Opinion

Seward v. Musick Auction, LLC

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 2018No. Docket 44543-2016PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORTON, Justice.

This appeal relates to a purported agreement resolving a lawsuit between Kevin Seward and Musick Auction, LLC ("Musick"). Seward claimed that the parties entered into a binding oral settlement agreement and he moved to enforce the agreement. The district court granted Seward's motion. Musick's appeal contends that the district court erred in several respects when it held that the parties had entered into a binding settlement agreement. We affirm.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Seward began working for Musick in August of 2014 and was terminated on February 5, 2015.…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. G&M Farms v. Funk Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Baxter v. CraneyIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  3. James Adams v. Johns-Manville Corporation, and Raymark Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. Ada County Highway District v. Total Success Investment, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Werry v. Phillips Petroleum CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1975

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Valiant Idaho v. VP IncorporatedIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Brunobuilt v. StrataIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Kosmann v. DiniusIdaho Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Bailey v. Birch (In re Birch)Idaho Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Carter Dental v. CarterIdaho Supreme Court · 2024

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API