Legal Opinion

Macurda v. Globe Newspaper Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine

Decided November 19, 1908No. 82PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On Motion to Dismiss for Want of Jurisdiction.

1Opinion of the Court

HALE, District Judge.

This case comes before the court on defendant's motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s writ and action for want of jurisdiction. The record, to which the motion is addressed, shows the facts to be as stated by the defendant. The motion clearly defines the precise question at issue, and is as follows:

“And now conics the Globe Newspaper Company, defendant in tlie above-entitled action, and respectfully represents to the court that it is a foreign corporation, organized and existing under the laws of the state of Massachusetts, and having its local ion and principal place of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bacon v. RivesSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. McDonald v. GreenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  3. Cook v. WhitneyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Mississippi · 1877

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cant v. BartlettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  2. Colman v. ShimerDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1958
  3. Quevli Farms, Inc. v. Union Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  4. Sullivan v. LloydDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1914
  5. Pere Marquette Ry. Co. v. Western Heater DispatchDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API