Legal Opinion

Heeron v. Beckwith

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1853PublishedCited by 12 opinions

ERROR TO THE DANE COUNTY COURT. A statement of this case, and the points made hy counsel, are fully contained in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Smith, J.

The plaintiff in error seems to have made up his case and points from his *18own 0])gex'vations or notes at the trial before the justice, instead of the record as certified by the clerk. # d Let it be here remarked, that the rule of this court requiring an abstract of the case to be printed, is no idle formula. It is a rule that must be observed ; and counsel and attorneys are expected to conform that abstract truly to the record, by which the case must be adjudicated by this court. We are unwilling to believe that there was any design to present an unfair or untruthful…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Yates v. Fassett & WhitlockNew York Supreme Court · 1847

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hutchinson v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
  2. McNarra v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Cullen v. HanischWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Davis v. State, Dept. of CorrectionsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  5. Everit v. Walworth County BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1861

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API