Legal Opinion

Kay v. Kuehner v. Dickinson & Company, an Iowa Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 5, 1996No. 94-56529PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FARRIS, Circuit Judge:

I

Kay Kuehner sued Dickinson & Co. for violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act and wrongful discharge under California tort law. She appeals the district court’s interlocutory order staying proceedings pending the arbitration of her claims. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) and 9 U.S.C. § 16(b). We affirm.

Dickinson & Co. hired Kuehner as a securities sales representative on September 14, 1992. Kuehner alleges that two months after she was hired, she requested pay at a mini mum wage for all of the hours she worked. Kuehner alleges that Dickinson & Co.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Reese v. BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. Adkins v. Labor Ready, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
  3. Couch v. Telescope Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. Manning v. Boston Medical Center Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
  5. Susan M. ROSENBERG, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC. and John Wyllys, Defendants, AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API