Legal Opinion

Blankinship v. Oklahoma City Light & Water Power Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 13, 1896PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from the District Court of Oklahoma County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

MoAtee, J.:

This suit was brought by the Southern Distilling company in the probate court of Oklahoma county on the 6th day of July, 1893, against the defendants, to recover two barrels of whiskey, or their value, alleged at one hundred and sixty dollars.

A general denial was filed by all the defendants except Clark and White, who answered that they held the whiskey in controversy by reason of writs of attachment placed in tbeir hands as constables of Oklahoma county, Oklahoma Territory, and that the property in said whiskey was in M. Winter.

It was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex parte HayesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. State v. LundSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  3. People v. Di FalcoNew York Court of Appeals · 1978

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. JarvisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Rogers v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
  3. Yamie v. WillmottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  4. Parish v. NedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  5. Walker v. EikleberrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API