Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Vivenzio v. City of Syracuse

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 1, 2010No. Docket 08-2436-cvPublished

1Concurrence

DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON, Circuit Judge, joined by ERIC N. VITALIANO, District Judge,

concurring:

I concur fully in the majority’s disposition and analysis. I write separately to note my disagreement with the district court’s conclusion that the plaintiffs “do not challenge the constitutionality of the consent decree.” See Vivenzio v. City of Syracuse (Vivenzio I), 545 F.Supp.2d 241, 250 n. 2 (N.D.N.Y.2008). I believe that the plaintiffs do make such a challenge, though I reach no conclusion as to whether plaintiffs adequately presented it before the district court. I also conclude that the merits…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Harper v. Virginia Department of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. City of Richmond v. J. A. Croson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Allstate Insurance Company v. Gregory V. SerioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  4. Jeffrey Todd Dean v. The City of ShreveportCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  5. Edwards v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API