Legal Opinion

Parham v. Austin Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 17, 1946No. 11622PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLER, Circuit Judge.

The Appellants were watchmen and guards employed by the Appellee during the time that the latter was constructing, for the United States, a plant at which it was intended that bombers would be made upon completion of the plant. These guards brought suit under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq., to recover the statutory wages, damages, etc. The period of employment covered by their suit is prior to any production of bombers in the plant. Their employer’s connection with the plant ended upon its completion. Appellants’ duty was to protect the job and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Noonan v. Fruco Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Ford, Bacon & Davis, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
  2. Wesley E. Archer v. Brown & Root, Inc., and T. L. James & Co., Inc., D/B/A Louisiana Bridge Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  3. Daves v. Hawaiian Dredging Co.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1953
  4. Reed v. MurpheyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
  5. McComb v. TurpinDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1948

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API