Breeze v. International Banking Corp.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. James M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The plaintiff instituted this action for the purpose of recovering from the defendants the sum of three thousand two hundred and fifty dollars, together with interest from the fourth day of April, 1907.
The trial court gave the plaintiff judgment in the sum of $3,741.26 against the defendant, Robbins, but rendered judgment in favor of the bank.
This appeal is prosecuted by the plaintiff on the judgment-roll alone from that part of the judgment which was rendered and entered in favor of the bank.
The gist of the complaint, in brief and in substance, is that the defendants jointly entered into a…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Frey v. CliffordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- People v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Perry v. QuackenbushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Foorman v. WallaceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Pico v. CuyasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fitzpatrick v. UnderwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Whitney v. RedfernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Enterprise Foundry Co. v. PollyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Ferl v. FerlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Garrison v. Edward Brown & SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.