Garrison v. Edward Brown & Sons
California Supreme Court
1DissentSchauer, J.
I dissent.This is a judgment roll appeal. We do not know what evidence was before the trial court. As shown in the findings of fact (quoted more fully in the majority opinion) the trial court found, among other things, that “Prior to January 6, 1933, it was agreed between Edward Brown & Sons and Union Indemnity Company that the relationship between Union Indemnity Company on account of premiums on its policies and bonds collected by and paid to Edward Brown & Sons should be that only of a debtor and creditor and that . . . the only obligation or duty of Edward Brown & Sons in respect of any…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Perry v. QuackenbushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Pico v. CuyasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- Stiles v. BodkinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Whitney v. RedfernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Carpenter v. FroloffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.