State v. Morgan
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*677WARREN, J.
Defendant was convicted of rape in the first degree. ORS 163.375. He assigns as error the triad court’s refusal to allow him to introduce evidence of prior consensual sexual intercourse with complainant. We reverse and remand for a new trial.
Complainant testified that defendant forced sexual intercourse with her. Evidence was presented that, before the alleged rape, defendant and complainant had been dating for approximately a month and a half. Complainant testified that she wanted to break off her relationship with defendant and that defendant said “no girl ever broke off with him…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. JaloCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- State v. ReiterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. LeClairCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- United States v. StamperDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1991
- State v. Zaldana-MendozaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- State v. BassCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- State v. CervantesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.