Legal Opinion
United States v. Stamper
District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Decided June 12, 1991No. Crim. B-CR-90-174PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD L. VOORHEES, Chief Judge.
Defendant moved for permission to introduce certain evidence notwithstanding the provisions of Fed.R.Evid. 412. Defendant’s Motion Pursuant to Rule 412 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, filed November 9, 1990 (Pleading No. 25). The proffered evidence consists of cross examination of the prosecuting witness, an alleged statutory rape victim (hereinafter “complainant”), and certain extrinsic evidence, all intended to show that in the past the complainant had schemed to accomplish certain personal goals by falsely accusing three…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Hammer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
- People v. CruzIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
- Roger Boggs v. Terry Collins, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Ronald Gene Kenyon, Also Known as Ronald G. BingenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- James Quinn v. William S. Haynes, Warden, Huttonsville Correctional Center Darrell v. McGraw Jr., Attorney General of the State of West VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.