Legal Opinion

Charles Fountain v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 28, 1956No. 12952_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This appellant was indicted, the first count charging an assault to commit rape and the second, alleging he took “indecent liberties” with a child. The court ruled that the child was incompetent to testify, but admitted the testimony of adults to outcries and statements of the child. Fountain was acquitted of the second charge but was convicted of the first.

The principal question before us on this appeal is whether the evidence was sufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt the guilt of Fountain on the count of which he was convicted— assault to commit rape, and in particular whether…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Beausoliel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  4. Hammond v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  5. Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Herbert W. Bray v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
  2. Henry Wilson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
  3. Konvalinka v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1960
  4. Fred Inman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
  5. Villines v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API