Legal Opinion

Villines v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 4, 1974No. 7302PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant was convicted of inducing a female to engage in prostitution, D.C. Code 1973, § 22-2705, 1 compelling a female to reside with him for the purpose of prostitution, D.C.Code 1973, § 22-2706, 2 assault with a dangerous weapon (a shod foot), D.C.Code 1973, § 22-502, 3 and malicious disfigurement, D.C.Code 1973, § 22-506. 4 We affirm.

Our review of the record satisfies us that there was sufficient evidence for the jury to find appellant guilty of each offense. The evidence can be summarized as follows: The complainant moved to Washington, D.C., from Richmond, Virginia, after her high…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Allen Allison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  3. Ernest W. Harried v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  4. Kelly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
  5. United States v. Lee R. SmithCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Allen v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Logan v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. MICHAEL A. HARTLEY v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API