Villines v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Appellant was convicted of inducing a female to engage in prostitution, D.C. Code 1973, § 22-2705, 1 compelling a female to reside with him for the purpose of prostitution, D.C.Code 1973, § 22-2706, 2 assault with a dangerous weapon (a shod foot), D.C.Code 1973, § 22-502, 3 and malicious disfigurement, D.C.Code 1973, § 22-506. 4 We affirm.
Our review of the record satisfies us that there was sufficient evidence for the jury to find appellant guilty of each offense. The evidence can be summarized as follows: The complainant moved to Washington, D.C., from Richmond, Virginia, after her high…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Allen Allison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Ernest W. Harried v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Kelly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- United States v. Lee R. SmithCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Allen v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Logan v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- MICHAEL A. HARTLEY v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.