Legal Opinion
Spink v. Lockheed Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 18, 1995No. 92-56094PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRUNETTI, Circuit Judge:
Paul Spink filed a complaint on behalf of himself and similarly situated individuals against Lockheed Corporation and certain individual defendants (collectively “Lockheed”). Spink alleged that Lockheed’s retirement plan violated the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq., and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., as amended by the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1986 (OBRA 1986), Pub.L. No. 99-509, 100 Stat. 1874 (1986). The complaint also included individual claims based on ERISA and the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Robi v. Five Platters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Raczak v. Ameritech Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Systems Council Em-3, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Afl-Cio v. At&t CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- Spink v. Lockheed CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Community Foundation Medical Group v. Community Health Partners, CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- Gary Raczak v. Ameritech CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.