Mumford v. Croft
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Herrmann, J.;
The complaint in this case alleges that between January 1, 1950 and August 27, 1952, the defendants converted to their own use money belonging to the plaintiffs in the sum of $7,637.38. By their answer, the defendants make a general denial. Pursuant to Rule 33, the plaintiffs proposed 51 interrogatories to be answered by the defendants under oath. Objections to the interrogatories have been filed on the ground that the answers thereto may tend to incriminate the defendants. They seek to invoke Article I, Section 7 of the Constitution of Delaware which provides : “In all criminal…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- McCarthy v. ArndsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Ziegler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Gendron v. BurnhamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1951
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Davis v. Brooks Transportation CompanyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1960
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1999
- City of Chicago v. LordAppellate Court of Illinois · 1954
- Carey v. Bryan & RollinsSuperior Court of Delaware · 1954
- Insurance Company of North America v. SteiglerSuperior Court of Delaware · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.