Legal Opinion

Carey v. Bryan & Rollins

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided May 6, 1954No. 115PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Herrmann, J.:

The claimant seeks workmen’s compensation for injuries sustained when a motor vehicle, which he was driving, ran off the road and struck a telephone pole.

During the hearing before the Industrial Accident Board, the claimant testified upon direct examination regarding details of the accident in which he sustained the injuries for which he now claims compensation. The following exchange took place during cross-examination of the claimant:

“Q. Now during the course of that evening did you have anything to drink that had alcohol in it?
“Mr. TunneH: I object to that unless Mr. Wilson…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. St. PierreCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  2. Ætna Life Insurance v. CarrollSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  3. Roddy v. FinneganCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1876
  4. King v. Empire Collieries Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1927
  5. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. NationsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. BradfordSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1962
  2. Fiorucci v. C. F. Braun & Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1961
  3. Carey v. Bryan & RollinsSuperior Court of Delaware · 1955
  4. Gray v. DerderianDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2005
  5. Ratsep v. Mrs. Smith's Pie CompanySuperior Court of Delaware · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API