Legal Opinion

Livingston v. Friend Bros.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 31, 1939PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order of Appellate Division affirmed. The Appellate Division was right in ruling that prejudicial error was committed by the trial judge in refusing to rule as requested by the defendant that there “is no evidence of negligence on the part of the defendant’s agents or servants.” There was evidence that the plaintiff, a customer in the defendant’s store, on a rainy day slipped on some mud or grease on the floor, which was wet. The fact that the floor was wet did not warrant a finding of negligence. Bornstein v. R. H. White Co. 259 Mass. 34. Tariff v. S. S. Kresge Co. 299 Mass. 129. And a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anjou v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  2. Newell v. Wm. Filene's Sons Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  3. Norton v. HudnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  4. Hudson v. F. W. Woodworth Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  5. Blake v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dawson v. Carolina Power & Light CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. Pettie v. Stop & Shop Supermarket Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1996
  3. Wetmore v. McLellan Stores Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  4. Aceto v. LeggMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API