Hollowform, Inc. v. Aeh
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1DissentMiller, Judge
This appeal involves, as the majority puts it, “what is in contemplation of law an identical mark on identical goods.” The issue is whether, accepting the allegations as true, appellant-opposer’s notice of opposition states a claim on the basis of which the board could have granted relief. If it does, the Board erred in granting appellee-applicant’s motion to dismiss the opposition.
Section 13 of the Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. § 1063) provides that any person who believes he would be damaged by the registration of a mark upon the principal register may institute an opposition proceeding. After…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hanover Star Milling Co. v. MetcalfSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- United Drug Co. v. Theodore Rectanus Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- In re E. I. DuPont DeNemours & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works v. Nu-Enamel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Sweetarts, a Corporation v. Sunline, Inc., and Menlo F. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.