Van Vlissingen v. Oliver
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in justice court in the city of Moorhead for forcible entry and unlawful detainer. At the time of hearing the motion for change of venue, as mentioned in the opinion, was made and denied. From the judgment of dismissal the plaintiff appealed to the district court for ■Clay county. The appeal was dismissed, Baxter, J. From the judgment of dismissal, plaintiff appealed. Reversed and remanded.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
Action of forcible entry and unlawful detainer, brought in justice court. The allegations of the complaint were to the effect that the plaintiff was the owner of the lot in question and entitled to the possession thereof, but that the defendants unlawfully detained possession thereof. The answer admitted that the plaintiff was the owner of the lot, denied the other alegations of the complaint, and contained allegations to the effect that the defendants were lawfully in possession of *238the lot and had the right to continue therein by virtue of an agreement with the plaintiff.
When the case came…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Thorp v. LorenzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Gray v. HurleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- Steinam v. SchulteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by3 opinions
- School Dist. No. 65 of Randolph County v. WrightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
- H. Christiansen & Sons, Inc. v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Doyle v. LongSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939