Legal Opinion

School Dist. No. 65 of Randolph County v. Wright

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 19, 1931PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, O. J.,

(after stating the facts). Counsel for appellant first insist that the contract is void and unenforceable because the record does not show that the electors of the common school district at the annual school meeting voted to keep the school open more than three months in a year, as required by § 8952,' Crawford & Moses’ Digest. Under our settled rules of practice, this assignment of error is not before us for review. The record shows that, at the time of, or after the parties had made their statements to the jury, the court ruled that the burden was on the defendant to establish…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Howard v. . DalyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Hamilton v. LoveIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Farrell v. School-District No. 2Michigan Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Tate v. School District No. 11Supreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  5. Beissel v. Vermillion Farmers Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Eve v. Hegler, and the Arkansas Teachers Association, Inc. v. The Board of Education of the Bearden School District, Bearden, ArkansasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
  2. Lake Village Implement Company v. CoxSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  3. Martin v. Board of EducationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Newton v. Calhoun County School DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
  5. Stoddard v. District School Board for School District No. 91Oregon Supreme Court · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API