Legal Opinion

Gray v. Hurley

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 31, 1881PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the municipal court of Minneapolis, overruling his demurrer to the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

This was a proceeding in the municipal court of the city of Minneapolis, by a landlord against a tenant, for the restitution of the leased premises, on the ground of non-payment of rent. It was commenced by a summons in the form prescribed by Gen. St. 1878, c. 84, relating to forcible entries and unlawful detainers, issued upon the filing of a complaint in the manner provided by that chapter. The defendant interposed a pleading in the form of a demurrer, alleging as a ground of demurrer that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, but shows on its face…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. William Weisman Holding Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  2. Northwest Holding Co. v. EvansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  3. Lilienthal v. TordoffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  4. Goldberg v. FieldsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  5. Pushor v. DaleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API