Legal Opinion

United States v. Lusk

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided December 24, 1985No. SPCM 18479PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

WOLD, Senior Judge:

Appellant was convicted by the members of a special court martial, contrary to his pleas, of disobedience of a noncommissioned officer, larceny of $10.00, larceny of two grenade simulators, larceny of five smoke grenades, larceny of a CS (tear gas) grenade, possession of marijuana, and wrongful sale of government property. His sentence to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for six months and forfeiture of $280.00 pay per month for six months was approved by the convening authority.

Appellant has asserted several errors. Those which we do…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. Walter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Aday v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Sovereign News Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  5. United States v. ApkerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. PooleU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987
  2. United States v. EnglishU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1988
  3. United States v. SlaughterArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API