Legal Opinion

Hatt v. McGraw

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided October 1, 2018No. 17-P-1556Published

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiffs sued in Superior Court to prevent the trustees of the Berkshire Museum (museum) from selling several valuable pieces of art and moved for a preliminary injunction to that effect. A judge denied the motion and dismissed their complaint for lack of standing. The plaintiffs challenge both rulings on appeal on various grounds. We affirm.

Discussion. 1. Standing.5 The plaintiffs contend that they have standing to sue: (a) to enforce the museum's contractual founding documents; (b) to protect their rights as corporate members of the museum; and (c) derivatively as corporate members of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ginther v. Commissioner of InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  2. General Convention of the New Jerusalem in the United States of America, Inc. v. MacKenzieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  3. Lopez v. Medford Community Center, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  4. Group Insurance Commission v. Labor Relations CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  5. Weaver v. WoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API