Legal Opinion

City of Crossville v. Middle Tennessee Utility District

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1961PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Tomlinson

City of Crossville filed its declaratory judgment bill for the purpose of having determined its rights and those of the Middle Tennessee Utility District with reference to a franchise granted by Crossville to the Middle Tennessee Utility District to distribute for sale natural gas to the people of Crossville. The Chancellor sustained the Utility District’s demurrer; wherefore, Crossville has appealed.

"We take it that the suit was filed and appeal prosecuted out of an abundance of caution, due regard being given to future activities and expenditures, etc. within the premises.

As alleged in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chandler Investment Co. v. Whitehaven Utility DistrictCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1957

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Town of Rogersville Ex Rel. Rogersville Water Commission v. Mid Hawkins County Utility DistrictCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
  2. White House Gas Utility District v. Cross Plains Natural Gas Utility DistrictCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1969
  3. West Wilson Utility District v. AtkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Milcrofton Utility District of Williamson County, Tennessee v. City of Brentwood, TennesseeDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2020
  5. Milcrofton Utility District of Williamson County, Tennessee v. Non-Potable Well Water, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API