Legal Opinion

Rauda v. Oregon Roses, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1999No. CC 9410-75CV; CA A90331; SC S44257PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

In this employment dispute, the parties disagree whether plaintiffs stated a claim for wrongful discharge. We conclude, however, that the trial court’s judgment is not appealable. Accordingly, we vacate the decision of the Court of Appeals and dismiss defendant’s appeal.

Plaintiffs are agricultural workers who allege that defendant, their employer, discharged them for discussing the terms of their compensation with defendant’s agent. Plaintiffs filed two claims regarding the discharges: breach of contract and wrongful discharge. Defendant moved to dismiss the complaint in its entirety for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. Oregon Gold Mining Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Industrial Leasing Corp. v. Van DykeOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Rader v. BarrOregon Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Russell v. SheahanOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Twitchell v. RisleyOregon Supreme Court · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Allen v. County of JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. Reed v. Jackson County Citizens LeagueCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  3. Thompson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. In re the Marriage of JensenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. Varde v. Run! Day Camp For Dogs, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API