Legal Opinion

In re Town of Saratoga

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 7, 1914PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal by the Town of Easton from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Schenectady Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Saratoga on the 23d day of September, 1913, directing the town of Easton to cause its superintendent of highways to join in rebuilding the bridge mentioned in the order.

1Opinion of the Court

Kellogg, J.:

The Hudson river forms the boundary line between the counties of Washington and Saratoga; the town of Easton, in Washington county, is on the east bank, and the town of Saratoga, in Saratoga county, on the west bank. A small island, about 200 feet in width and about 1,800 feet long, divides the river into two channels at the place where the bridge is located. A bridge extends from the Easton side of the river to the island and from the island to the Saratoga side. It was formerly owned by a bridge company as a toll bridge, and in February, 1911, the two counties purchased it…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Khoury v. County of SaratogaNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  2. Salzman v. ImpellitteriNew York Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Khoury v. County of SaratogaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  4. Bronx Parkway Commission v. HylanNew York Supreme Court · 1922
  5. City of Redding v. County of ShastaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API