Legal Opinion
City of Redding v. County of Shasta
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 25, 1918No. Civ. No. 1790PublishedCited by 2 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
In the first cause of action it is alleged that defendant is indebted to plaintiff in the sum of $28,-235.53 “for money paid out and expended by said plaintiff for the use and benefit of said defendant in the construction of a concrete bridge over and across the Sacramento Biver at Beid’s Ferry and in said City of Bedding and in said County of Shasta, and which said bridge crosses the line between said City of Bedding and Boad District Number Four (4) of said County of Shasta, and which said bridge connects and is a part of the public highway leading from and within said City of Bedding on…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Washer v. Bullitt CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Brown v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Brown v. Board of Education of City of PomonaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Symons v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Western Granite & Marble Co. v. SoucCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Menzel Estate Co. v. City of ReddingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- People v. AlbinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952