Legal Opinion

In Re MacK

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 5, 1994No. CX-90-2713PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

519 N.W.2d 900 (1994)

In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against John E. MACK, an Attorney at Law of the State of Minnesota.

No. CX-90-2713.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

August 5, 1994.

Marcia A. Johnson, Director, Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board, Patrick R. Burns, Sr. Asst. Director, St. Paul, for petitioner.

Ronald H. Schneider, Willmar, for respondent.

Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.

OPINION

2Per curiam

On October 23, 1991, this court accepted a stipulation for discipline negotiated as a result of disciplinary proceedings instituted by the Lawyers Professional Responsibility…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  2. Peterson v. SheranCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  3. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against HunterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  4. State v. CasbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Peterson v. SheranDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against HougeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against ThedensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  3. In re Reinstatement to the Practice of Law of MackSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API