Legal Opinion

Peavy v. Hardin

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 18, 1926No. 1908PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWadthall, J.

Appellants, Peavy and wife, brought this suit against appellees, Carl C. Hardin, John B. Hardin, and Paul B. Chandler, to recover damages, actual and exemplary, alleged to have been sustained by them, alleging that they applied to appellees at their drug store for a bottle of coco quinine to give to their daughter, a child about 2y2 years old, but that appellees negligently gave them another and different medicine instead thereof, different in substance and in medicinal effect from that called for, to wit, coco quinidine; that, relying upon said medicine as being that requested, they gave it…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BighamTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. LeeTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Freeman v. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1926

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lopez v. HeesenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Michels v. BorutaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  3. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. HarringtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. Burke v. BeanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  5. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. HarringtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API