Legal Opinion

Kerschbaugher v. Slusser

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1859PublishedCited by 13 opinions

APPEAL from the Huntington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHanna, J.

This was an action for slander. Three sets of words were laid in the complaint, as having been spoken by the defendant. One set laid in the German language, with an English translation. Two sets in the English language. General denial. After the plaintiff had closed his evidence to the jury, the defendant asked and obtained leave, over the objection of the plaintiff, to file an answer, setting up the statute of limitations.

The Court refused to give the following instruction asked by the plaintiff:

“ That under the present practice, no language can be recognized in the pleadings but the…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Maxwell v. DayIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Burr v. MendenhallIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Londoner v. People ex rel. BartonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  4. Hoot v. SpadeIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  5. Blaser v. KrattigerOregon Supreme Court · 1921

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API