Legal Opinion

Hoot v. Spade

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1863PublishedCited by 12 opinions

APPEAL from the Mkhart Common Pleas.

1Per curiam

Suit to foreclose a mortgage. Judgment for the defendant.

John Id. Baker and Myron Baker, for the appellants.1

The following established legal propositions dispose of the' questions arising in the cause.

1. Where there is a failure of title to a part of a tract of land purchased and taken possession of, and there is’ not a rescission of the contract on that account, the measure of damages on eviction from such part, in the absence of special circumstances, is a sum bearing the same proportion to the price ofTFe whole that such part bears to the entire tract of land. Philips v. Reichert, 17 Ind.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Phillips v. ReichertIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Miles v. VanhornIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Kerschbaugher v. SlusserIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Dodds v. TonerIndiana Supreme Court · 1852

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Levy v. ChittendenIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Burr v. MendenhallIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  3. First National Bank of Cambridge City v. ColterIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Londoner v. People ex rel. BartonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  5. Blankenship v. LanierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API