Legal Opinion

Flaherty v. Bookhultz

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1956Published

1Opinion

ON REHEARING

*471L. V. Weiser argued the cause for appellants. On the briefs were Weiser & Bowles, Portland. Fred B. Duffy argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were William J. Crawford and Parker & Duffy, Portland. Before Warner, Chief Justice, and Tooze, Rossman, Lusk, Brand and Perry, Justices.

On Rehearing

2Per curiam

Defendants’ petition for a rehearing was allowed, and the cause was reargued on April 18, 1956. Our original opinion was handed down December 7, 1955. In their petition and on oral argument defendants, in part, contended that we erred in our original opinion in the following respects:

“I…

3Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ullmann v. MayOhio Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Zinn v. Ex-Cell-O Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Barnes v. Eastern & Western Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Ward v. TOWN TAVERNOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Yellow Manufacturing Acceptance Corp. v. BristolOregon Supreme Court · 1951

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API