Legal Opinion

Perkins v. Philadelphia Life Insurance

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided March 5, 1984No. 83-0350-CV-W-5PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND MEMORANDUM

SCOTT O. WRIGHT, District Judge.

Plaintiff has brought this diversity action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332, alleging that the defendant has vexatiously refused to pay her benefits under a life insurance policy. Defendant contends that it properly refused to pay benefits. Trial was held before the Court on January 26, 1984. After careful consideration of the evidence and applicable law, the Court finds that the plaintiff is entitled to the insurance benefits, but that the defendant’s refusal to pay was not vexatious, arbitrary or unreasonable. For the reasons stated, judgment…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Miller v. Home Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  2. Columbia Union National Bank v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Inez L. Perkins v. Philadelphia Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  2. Master Mortgage Investment Fund, Inc. v. American National Fire Insurance (In Re Master Mortgage Investment Fund, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1993
  3. Insituform Technologies, Inc. v. American Home Assurance Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
  4. Inez L. Perkins v. Philadelphia Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API