Legal Opinion
Kohler v. Shenasky
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided August 15, 1995No. Civil Action MJG-94-3240PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARBIS, District Judge.
The Court has before it Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment. Having considered the legal memoranda submitted by the parties, the Court finds a hearing unnecessary to resolve the Motion.
I. BACKGROUND 1
Plaintiff Carole Kohler was diagnosed in 1984 as suffering from multiple sclerosis. She also suffers from massive obesity, hypothyroidism, hypertension and irritable bowel syndrome. As a result of the multiple sclerosis, Plaintiffs ability to walk is impaired, and she is required to be stationary for much of the day. This immobility,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Burnett v. GrattanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Brilliant Semenova v. MD Transit AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
- Wonasue v. University of Maryland Alumni Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Jeandron v. Board of Regents of the University System of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- Lipenga v. KambalameDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2016
- Brengle v. Greenbelt Homes, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2011
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.