Legal Opinion

Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railroad v. Medlock

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1918No. 23,108PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From the Harrison Circuit Court; William Ridley, Judge. Action by Albert C. Medlock against the Chicago, Indianapolis and Louisville Railway Company. From a. judgment for the plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, C. J.

*2261 *225. This appeal is based on a judgment for $7,000 recovered by appellee on account of personal injuries which he sustained while in the employ of appellant. The first four assignments of error present substantially the same questions for determination and' challenge respectively the several paragraphs of complaint on which the cause was tried. It appears from that pleading that on the day of his injury appellee was at work as a member of one of appellant’s section crews; that on said day a carload of logs in one of appellant’s trains became disarranged to such an extent as to endanger the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. ConoyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Holmes v. McPheetersIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  3. J. Wooley Coal Co. v. TevaultIndiana Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Shirley Hill Coal Co. v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Portland Foundry & Machine Co. v. GibsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Talge Mahogany Co. v. BurrowsIndiana Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API