Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Floyd v. Nines

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided March 15, 2024No. 1:22-cv-01530Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND NOLAN KINARD FLOYD, SR., Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No.: MJM-22-1530 JEFFREY NINES, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Self-represented plaintiff Nolan Kinard Floyd, Sr. initiated this civil rights action by filing a complaint, pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

against Warden Jeffrey Nines, Chief of Security Ronald Stotler,1 Sgt. Benjamin Crowe, Lt. Sean McKenzie, and Hearing Officer Christopher Wedlock (collectively, “Defendants”).2 ECF No. 1. Floyd brings claims for violations of his Fourth, Fifth, Eighth, Thirteenth, and…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API