Legal Opinion
Williams v. Pryor
District Court, N.D. Alabama
Decided October 10, 2002No. CIV.A.98-S-1938-NEPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SMITH, District Judge.
This case is before the court on remand from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals for further consideration of plaintiffs’ as-applied constitutional challenge to an Alabama statute prohibiting the distribution of “any device designed or marketed as useful primarily for the stimulation of human genital organs.” Alabama Code § 13A-12-200.2(a)(1) (1975) (Supp.2001). See Williams v. Pryor, 240 F.3d 944, 955-56 (11th Cir.2001), rev’g Williams v. Pryor, 41 F.Supp.2d 1257 (N.D.Ala.1999). For convenience, the prohibited appliances will be referred to in this…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sherri Williams v. Attorney General of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Doctor John's, Inc. v. City of RoyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Sherri Williams v. Troy KingCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- PHE, Inc. v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
- 1568 Montgomery Highway, Inc. v. City of HooverSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.