Legal Opinion

Hagglund v. Nelson

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 6, 1937No. Civ. 5861PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The defendant has appealed from a judgment for $655.24 which was rendered against him in a suit for injuries received by the plaintiff in a railroad crossing casualty. The plaintiff was riding as a guest in the defendant’s automobile. The cause was based on alleged wilful misconduct of the defendant in attempting to cross the railroad track ahead of an approaching passenger train. The case was tried by the court sitting without a jury. Findings were adopted against the defendant. From the judgment which was accordingly rendered this appeal was perfected. The sole ground for a reversal is the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Meek v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Howard v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Turner v. Standard Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Norton v. PuterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Avery v. ThompsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Pacific General Contractors, Inc. v. Slate Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Van Fleet v. HeylerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Kelly v. TracyOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Hallman v. RichardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Allen v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API