Legal Opinion

Crossmark, Inc. v. Hazar

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided January 15, 2004No. 05-02-01169-CVPublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice MOSELEY.

The issues in this appeal center on the judicial confirmation of an arbitration award, and conversely, the grounds for vacating or modifying such an award. Appellant Crossmark, Inc. (“Crossmark”) appeals the trial court’s final judgment, based in part on a prior interlocutory summary judgment, that confirms an arbitration award in favor of appellees John and Jim Hazar (the “Hazars”). In six issues, Crossmark asserts the trial court: (1) erred by confirming a piecemeal arbitration award; (2) erred by refusing to join an indispensable party; (3) erred by…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. FM Properties Operating Co. v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  3. City of Garland v. Dallas Morning NewsTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Guaranty Federal Savings Bank v. Horseshoe Operating Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Jones v. StraussTexas Supreme Court · 1988

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. McGrath v. FSI Holdings, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008
  2. Ancor Holdings, LLC v. Peterson, Goldman & Villani, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2009
  3. Statewide Remodeling, Inc. v. Williams, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008
  4. Centex/Vestal v. Friendship West Baptist Church, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2010
  5. Hamm v. Millennium Income Fund, L.L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API