Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lotoszinski v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 5, 1979No. Docket 78-3303Published

1DissentN. J. Kaufman, J.

I find it necessary to lodge my dissent to the position taken by my colleagues. A factual review is in order to highlight the reasons for my decision.

The parties to this proceeding have stipulated to a concise statement of facts. These facts provide, in pertinent part, that the accident out of which this claim arose involved a collision between a motorcycle and an automobile. The plaintiff was a passenger on the motorcycle which was operated by one Ronald Cordon. The automobile was owned by a Richard Hunter and driven by a Norma June Hunter. At the time of the accident on June 3, 1971, the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Blakeslee v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Porter v. Empire Fire and Marine Insurance CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange v. SpaffordMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Allstate Insurance v. AndersonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. BelcherMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API